Agentic treasury and payroll for Latin America, built on Stellar
"Software moves your money. Prove it was allowed to."
Nobody can prove it was allowed
Software is starting to move company money on its own. Once it does, nobody can prove afterward that a specific payment was authorized under specific terms. That gap is what keeps a finance team from letting an agent near its treasury.
It is most acute where the friction is already highest: companies paying distributed teams across Latin America. Volatile local currencies, slow and expensive cross-border rails, idle treasury cash earning nothing, compliance living in PDFs nobody can check.
Agents can sign. Nothing binds them yet
Agents are starting to hold real spending authority. Nothing today binds that authority to enforceable terms at the moment the agent signs.
The Legal Context Protocol launched in 2026: the American Arbitration Association and Integra Ledger, with the Stellar Development Foundation as a founding contributor. We did not invent it. We built the part that makes it enforceable at the signing path of an autonomous agent, the part nobody had built.
A signed manifest on every action
Contextio is an autonomous treasury and payroll agent. Every action that changes state is cryptographically bound to a signed Legal Context Protocol manifest, and the manifest hash goes on-chain with the transaction.
We are a Level 4 conformant implementation, self-assessed against the published criteria. The conformance report and the hash recomputation are public. Check it yourself:
# 1. Fetch the live discovery document and read the declared hash + version
curl -s "https://contextio-api.fly.dev/.well-known/contextio-legal-context.json?domain=contextio.xyz" \
| python3 -c 'import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(d["atrHash"], "v"+str(d["version"]))'
# 2. Fetch the terms document it points to, independently
curl -s "https://contextio-api.fly.dev/.well-known/contextio-terms.md" -o terms.md
# 3. Hash it yourself and compare to the atrHash from step 1
sha256sum terms.mdatrHash: 0x579eeabf5f640d9cbb274824287fa7d1ef540ae9cc773e79f6d2cec913b4237e (document version 8)
The company wallet signs. Not us
Company wallet signs
Freighter or Stellar Wallets Kit
Contextio proposes
Unsigned XDR, deterministic
Soroban executes
Blend, DeFindex, or classic ops
LCP binds it
Manifest hash goes on-chain
Funds stay in the company's own USDC wallet. Contextio holds no key that can move that money. On mainnet, a signing key cannot exist on the process: it refuses to boot if one is present.
The decision engine is deterministic and auditable. An LLM, any provider, bring your own key, only writes the plain-language explanation. It never makes a financial decision.
Live today, not a deck
Testnet runs the full autonomous stack, live 24/7: real Blend v2 lending, real DeFindex vaults, a real payroll contract, no human in the loop.
Mainnet is live and deliberately narrow: a real price oracle, self-custody actions, zero custodial surface, invitation-only while the contracts wait for external audit.
What it costs today, without Contextio
A LATAM company paying 25 distributed contractors around $2,000 a month each runs $50,000 of monthly payroll. Today it pays roughly $1,225 a month in platform fees, loses 2 to 4 percent to FX spread on cross-border settlement, and earns nothing on the one to two months of payroll it holds as a buffer.
| Platform fees (25 contractors, $49/mo each) | $1,225 / mo |
| FX spread on $50,000 settled cross-border | $1,000 to $2,000 / mo |
| Yield foregone on a 1 to 2 month buffer | not zero, not tracked |
| Close to | $2,800 / mo |
None of it shows up on a single invoice. Contextio starts at a fraction of that per month, and is the only one of the three costs above that also leaves a provable audit trail.
One subscription, priced by headcount
One revenue stream: a SaaS subscription, priced by how many people a company pays. Access to the software, nothing else.
No percentage of assets under management. No fee per transaction. No spread on the amount moved. No cut of principal.
That is also the compliance argument: it keeps us a software company, not an asset manager or a payment institution, in every jurisdiction we looked at.
A standard, not a moat
Payroll and treasury automation exist elsewhere, including on Stellar. None of them can prove to an auditor that a specific payment was authorized under specific legal terms. That layer is a standard, not a moat, which makes several of these projects possible integrators rather than rivals.
Off-chain, Deel, Remote, Ontop, and Payoneer have real distribution. Settlement is slow, expensive, and impossible to verify independently. Request Finance, Utopia Labs, Rise, and Superfluid do not combine autonomous treasury yield with payroll settlement, and none has an on-chain compliance layer.
Team
Giovanny Amador
CEO and lead architect, Stellar México Ambassador. Built the protocol: Soroban contracts, the autonomous agent, the SDK.
Monserrat Mendoza
COO, product and UX, Stellar México Ambassador.
Gonzalo Chacón
CCO, commercial strategy and go-to-market.
Gio and Monse are SDF SCALE and Impacta graduates.
Where we are, what's next
Post-launch, pre-revenue, one internal tenant today.
Next: external audit of the Soroban contracts, a licensed anchor relationship for real local-rail settlement in Brazil, Argentina, and Colombia, and the first external pilot customer.
Building this out through the Stellar Community Fund Integration Track.
For finance teams and for partners
For finance teams: request pilot access.
For investors and partners: talk to us.
Contextio is a non-custodial technology platform, not a fintech or financial services provider. Testnet is a free demo with test assets. Mainnet is invitation-only while the Soroban contracts await external audit.